Buchanan Automotive Posted 29September, 2019 Report Share Posted 29September, 2019 This is a timely reminder about a couple of things on the 928 series ( all ) that need to be inspected / tightened / maintained on a regular basis because without this basic tightening of some bolts ( its that basic ) the lack of maintenance eventually results in broken components that are very expensive and completely preventable . During this week we had a 928S ( 1984 auto ) that we used to work quite some years ago until it was sold ( we lost contact with this car ) , its one of those stunning garage queens , perfect paint ( no stone chips ) & no fading and near perfect interior , in other words never left out in the Australian sun , anyway with its new ( current ) owner we went over her carrying out servicing and repairs with some nice performance upgrades , but during the servicing and inspecting we discovered that over the last 7 or 8 years since we last saw this car and 14 years since we did a major service to this car , there were a couple of things that were on the verge of disaster A ) Engine cam gear retaining bolts ( one bolt per cam gear ) , the alloy cam gears on the 4.5 & 4.7L engines need their ( one ) retaining bolt checked for tightness very very regularly , we check them for tightness every major service ( every 20,000kms ) , the cam gear retaining bolts on this car were loose enough that both Sean & I were pleasantly surprised that the gears had not slipped ( this was a close one because they were not tight enough by a long shot ) , when they slip ( for want of a better expression ) , the alloy cam gear will bash forward and back against the key-way on the ( hollow) cam shaft boss & then that rapidly progresses to breaking the cam shaft in two ( the end breaks off ) and a new camshaft ( if you can even buy Left or Right bank one from Porsche these days for a Euro spec M28/21/22 is debatable ) & naturally is completely avoidable & gets even more expensive in that 90% + of the time a M28/21/22 will usually bend a valve or two at the same time ( not badly bent , but just enough to not seal well & that = low compression , so it ends up be a engine dismantle and some new valve/s , valve guides and a cam - shaft etc etc etc & its all avoidable . But to make it avoidable , one has to have the knowledge that this tightening procedure is needed in the first place and most people and repairer's are simply not aware of it . Note } It was an actual Porsche design issue with the height ( contact patch ) of the slide on steel sleeve that buts up against the inside of the cam gear , which Porsche finally made a lot better in the vary last year the 4.7L engine was made ( 1986 ) and not many countries still sold the 4.7L 928s in 1986 Note 2 } Even with the earlier slide on sleeve , its not an issue if you just tighten the bolt from time to time ( not hard to do ) Note 3 } Its even a small problem that's worth checking on the 5.0L & 5.4L Quadcam engines , but a rare problem ,we know of one 5 L S4 that suffered that fate ( broken cam ) and LOTS of bent valves some years ago , so its rare , but must be checked for piece of mind and about every 4 or 5 quad-cam engines we check the tightness ( torque value ) of the single retaining bolt for the alloy cam gear , the torque value ( tightness of the bolt ) is lower than it should be , so like I said they are ALL worth checking B ) On this 1984 year model 928S , we also went to check the tightness of the Torque Tube rear coupling inhex bolt & when we moved the exhaust heat shields out of the way and removed the small inspection hole rubber plug ( rear end of the T Tube ) & we were meet with a Red Dust display , meaning there was fine metal particles ( oxidized red rust colour in a dust form ) , we see this quite a lot ( unfortunately ) and this means the male splines on the T Tube quill shaft inside the female ( split in 3 places ) trans input shaft are not tight enough and are moving ( this is the very fine metal particles ) & just to see what the torque value was of this coupling bolt was we could turn it at least half a turn to get near the torque setting required . Now because the rear coupling was not tight enough I / we knew full well that the quill shaft had probably migrated forward , so we removed the ( front ) bell housing lower section & we could plainly see the flex plate pushed forward , so like we have had to do many many times over the decades we do the following } We removed the front coupling bolt ( it was quite tight ) , like they normally are We removed the rear coupling bolt ( this was the one that was way too loose ) , this bolt ( head and shaft ) was completely covered in the red dust & on the flank of the inhex bolt you could see where it was just starting to be dragged over ( yes over and into ) the male splines on the quill shaft Note } this rear coupling bolt always stretches from acceleration & probably engine braking events We then reset the TT quill shaft back into its center position and installed 2 x new genuine Porsche inhex bolts with greased threads ( not loctite ) & torque up & that's it Note } because this engine has been on 20w-50 and / or 15w-50 for decades , there was NO engine thrust bearing wear ( even though the flex plate was pushed in ) because the oil film strength protects the engine thrust bearings Note 2 } The reason NOT to use Loctite on the coupling bolt threads is because the bolts never ever undo ( they stretch & Loctite can not do a thing about stretching of a metal ) , but the worst thing about Loctite in this application is when you go back to check the tightness of the rear coupling bolt ( say ) 20,000kms later , the loctite on the treads will instantly give you the impression that the bolt is tight , but the bolt may well be stretched a tiny amount , but the threads are held tight and the bolt head will not move & the impression is that's it tight when it actually is not ( its a real trap for the unwary ) Note 3 } The T Tube coupling inhex bolt is only threaded for first 1/3rd of its length ( 15mm ) , the un-threaded part of the bolt length 30 mm is the section that mostly stretches & the head of the bolt reduces its clamping force against the coupling ( very basic engineering stuff ) Note 4 } The only Torque tube design on the 928 that was really quite good was the 3 speed auto version ( 1978-1983 ) , it had two ( solid ) male shafts connected by a sliding sleeve with 2 x same inhex bolts , why Porsche did split in 3 places hollow input shaft on the 4 speed auto ( 1984 > ) and the manual trans ( all 928 year models ) is / was and always be a built in weakness , but we have to live with the design & they can be maintained but it has to be a constant thing Note 5 } The cut in 3 places hollow input shaft on the 4 speed auto version quite often breaks ( metal fatigue ) if the rear coupling is allowed to move / chatter on its splines with insufficient tightness of the coupling Note 6 } The cut in 3 places hollow input shaft on the manual trans version ( much more expensive to replace ) suffers the same fate if neglected , we had to purchase a new 5th gear set ( that's the input shaft on the manual ) on a 1986 928S a few months ago ( broken ) through neglect from a long time ago . Regards Bruce & Sean Buchanan Buchanan Automotive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavn Posted 29September, 2019 Report Share Posted 29September, 2019 Thanks for the great post - always love reading your material & will be going over mine tomorrow with the above points in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9fan Posted 29September, 2019 Report Share Posted 29September, 2019 Thanks Bruce and Sean, any similar problems with 968 Torque tubes ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buchanan Automotive Posted 29September, 2019 Author Report Share Posted 29September, 2019 In regards of what I was mentioning about certain 928 models , that all centered around Porsche's decision to NOT to use what the 931 / 944 / 951 / 944S / 944S2 and the 3 speed ( Auto Trans 928 1978-1983 ) , that is the transmission has a solid splined male shaft coming out of the transmission to meet the solid male splined shaft from the Torque Tube & of course there was a female splined sleeve that joins the two solid shafts with two inhex bolts , it was a very sensible in design and worked very well and even more amusing would of been a bit cheaper to produce in production as it was already being made for the cars mentioned above So in essence its the Hollow Input shaft ( cut in 3 places so it can be clamped ) designed implemented on all the 4 speed auto trans 928S / S4 Auto / GTS Auto 1984 - 1995 and the same concept ( different part naturally) the manual transmissions input shafts ( all version 1978-1995 ) , its not a designe that can be left to its own devices over a long time , it has to be cared for , it has to be maintained , basically speaking it has to be tight at all times and as I mentioned with only 1 ( one ) lousy bolt , it will cause expensive repairs if neglected , its as basic as that & remember I am talking about the results of a V8 engine with its V8 Torque that will give this single bolt a real work out , if it was a low torque low output engine with less overall weight , say it was a 924 Auto , in this case ( low output ) it would not be an issue Now the 968 Manual trans ONLY , has a very nice , very strong splined female sliding sleeve with 4 ( four ) bolts = excellent Now the 968 Automatic trans version ( Tip ) , this has the same single bolt rear of torque tube clamp ( slides over and cut in 3 places) as the manual trans 928 has ( very similar to the 928s 4 speed auto one ) , so if the 968 Tip had a V8 engine it would eventually cause some issues , but being a 4 cylinder NA , its not really an issue , but that said , with the Tip , its not a bad idea to check the tightness of this single bolt from time to time & naturally the 968 Tip T Tube is completely different to the manual trans version Note } Like the 944 2.5L Auto , the 968 Auto Trans( Tip ) has the the 944 116 065 04 rubber Dampner bolted to the engine flywheel , its designed to soften out the 4 cylinder firing impulses , this in turn protects the single rear coupling quite a bit , in a way its the very very distant cousin of the dual mass flywheel & like I said only the 944Auto had one & the 968 Auto has one ( different part number ) & yes these are a bit of a weak link in old age , meaning they do break eventually , so the 968 Tip Torque Tube / drive line from the engine flywheel to the auto trans the only ( in old age ) weak link is the rubber dampner Regards Bruce Buchanan Buchanan Automotive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.