Carrera28 Posted 12November, 2014 Report Share Posted 12November, 2014 Good read, don't just skip to the end to read the outcome http://www.roadandtrack.com/features/magazine/2015-road-and-track-performance-car-of-the-year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coastr Posted 13November, 2014 Report Share Posted 13November, 2014 Wow, all that and they didn't mention that 'having an engine in the rear means this car shouldn't work, but it does'. Perhaps they left the big book of Porsche cliches at the track and had to think about it when they got back to the office. Indeed a good read. Shame we don't get the Viper here, but it's going to be good to see Mustangs sold properly from next year on. Much more interesting than taxis with racing stripes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Harold Posted 16November, 2014 Report Share Posted 16November, 2014 Great review and very well written, but one thing confuses me. How is it that it accelerates from 0 to 60 in 3.1 seconds yet on a rolling start 5 to 60 takes 3.9 seconds. I would have thought the rolling start would be quicker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevepGT3 Posted 16November, 2014 Report Share Posted 16November, 2014 Great review and very well written, but one thing confuses me. How is it that it accelerates from 0 to 60 in 3.1 seconds yet on a rolling start 5 to 60 takes 3.9 seconds. I would have thought the rolling start would be quicker. The computer probably doesn`t dip the clutch to raise revs when the car is already rolling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Harold Posted 17November, 2014 Report Share Posted 17November, 2014 I guess it must be something like that Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.